ANGLO AMERICAN CATALOGUING RULES PDF
ANGLO AMERICAN CATALOGUING RULES ± PART I. BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB . ANGLO AMERICAN CATALOGUING RULES ± PART II. BBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBBB . Following is a clean copy of Chapter 3, including revisions from JSC constituencies that were discussed at the JSC meeting of October
|Language:||English, Spanish, Indonesian|
|Genre:||Health & Fitness|
|ePub File Size:||17.48 MB|
|PDF File Size:||16.55 MB|
|Distribution:||Free* [*Registration Required]|
Since , Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules has served the profession with highly developed content standards for cataloging the resources that come into. ANGLO-AMERICAN CATALOGUING RULES Second Edition Revision contains complete text in PDF format System requirements for accompanying. Get this from a library! Anglo-American cataloguing rules: second edition: revision: update. [Joint Steering Committee for Revision.
Are entries under for example performers justified? If so, this may imply that the functions of the catalogue are in fact more extensive than those stated in the Paris Principles. What kinds of relationships should be reflected in entries specified by the code?
The Future of the Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules
Are there newly emerging relationships between persons and bibliographic items that should be reflected? Why are other instances of persons using more than one name not treated in this manner?
Is it possible to articulate a principle to reflect this inconsistent treatment? The assumption generally made is that the main entry heading together with the uniform title if applicable or the title proper serve as the standard form of citation for the work.
There is also an assumption generally made that two items with the same main entry heading and uniform title, or with the same main entry heading and title proper, are embodiments of the same work, and conversely, that two items are not embodiments of the same work unless they have the same main entry heading and uniform title or main entry heading and title proper.
These assumptions, however, do not apply equally across all permutations of the factors determining choice of entry.
These general assumptions appear to be valid when applied to cases where the content of the item is perceived to be a single work, although there are complications in the cases of works of shared or mixed responsibility and of modifications of works.
On the other hand, items containing more than one work are less easily accommodated by the general assumption. Because a citation main entry heading plus title can pertain to only one work, the relation of the main entry and uniform title to an item consisting of more than one work is more complicated than in the case of single works.
The main entry may represent only one work, it may represent several with a collective uniform title or it may represent a collection i. If the rules in Part II are to be re-examined with a view to establishing and articulating underlying principles related to the identity of a work and the parameters that determine the existence of a new work as distinct from another instance of the same work , the first question is whether any principles can be extrapolated from the complexity of criteria for determining choice of entry.
Are there any principles that can be articulated at a reasonably high level of generality? A second question is whether the current restrictions on the identification of works in items containing collections of works by different persons of bodies can be justified as an exception to statement 2.
However, there is a significant difference.
The definition in the Paris Principles is framed with reference to the work as an abstract entity, while the definition in AACR is framed with reference to the item as a physical entity. To the extent that the rules referred to in the previous section serve to bring together under a common citation all the entries for items containing the same work, the functional objective in the Paris Principles relating to editions of a work will be met.
However, there are provisions in the rules that compromise the principle. For example, if different editions of a work of shared responsibility give the names in different order, then the citation for those editions will be different.
There are also cases in which either no uniform title is assigned to editions of a work with different titles proper in the case of revision or updating of a work , or in which different uniform titles are assigned to different editions of the same work.
The first is that a main entry is needed in a single-entry catalogue. The second is that the citation form represented by the main entry heading and uniform title or title proper is essential for determining the form of a name-title added entry for a related work.
The Logical Structure of the Anglo-American Cataloging Rules Part II
It is the second of these reasons that is examined here. What ultimately determines the form of the title element in the citation is whether or not a uniform title has been established. We are a chartered institute and charity. Skip to search. Skip to main menu. Skip to main content.
Skip to footer. Books and eBooks.
See All Books and eBooks. See All eLearning.
See All Posters, Bookmarks, and Gifts. See All New and Noteworthy.
View Cart 0. ALA Member: Item Number: Description About the Authors Since , Anglo-American Cataloguing Rules has served the profession with highly developed content standards for cataloging the resources that come into your library.Descriptive cataloguing - Rules.
Because a citation main entry heading plus title can pertain to only one work, the relation of the main entry and uniform title to an item consisting of more than one work is more complicated than in the case of single works. Add a review and share your thoughts with other readers.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. The specific requirements or preferences of your reviewing publisher, classroom teacher, institution or organization should be applied.
A revision of the third edition incorporating amendments approved since was released in Anglo-American cataloguing rules: